User talk:PantheraLeo1359531

Archiv 0 | Archiv 2020 | Archiv 2021 | Archiv 2022 | Archiv 2023 | Archiv 2024 | Archiv 2025

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PantheraLeo1359531!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hofer Weihnachtsmarkt 20251219 HOF3439 RAW-Export (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hofer Weihnachtsmarkt 20251219 HOF3439 RAW-Export.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee 20251230 HOF4130-HDR RAW-Export CORR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee 20251230 HOF4108-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee 20251230 HOF4072-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:57, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4233 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 18:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4262 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4256 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --DimiTalen 17:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4265 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3960 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3983 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG Egertal 20251227 HOF3984 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3977 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:55, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Curator feedback

Hey 👋 I've a question for you. Are you using the app in multiple tabs at the same time? -- DaxServer (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer Hi! Not as I can remember :(. In very few cases, I have an uploading batch and trigger a retry in another batch to retry 2 or 3 failing files, but that's all actually. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

I made some changes, this time it could be more reliable than the last couple of days 🙈 -- DaxServer (talk) 10:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your tireless work, I can check it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

I made some more changes, let's give another try 🙈 -- DaxServer (talk) 15:22, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServerIt seems it is running again, thank you🥺--PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy to help :)

I just noticed pattern of the numbers in your username, I think it's cool! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, it is a palindrome, that contains an equation: 1+3+5=9=5+3+1 ;) (although I saw the equation after the naming :D ) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer Hi! I tested a larger batch with 6490 files l1QCIHNgZvYUfjRse09ybX (Batch #466). Unfortunately, we get the following error:

Server error '500 Internal Server Error' for url 'https://graph.mapillary.com/images?access_token=MLY%7C32349865367990972%7Cc0719f161a43af80d254e0fdbb61215e&sequence_ids=l1QCIHNgZvYUfjRse09ybX&fields=captured_at%2Ccompass_angle%2Ccreator%2Cgeometry%2Cheight%2Cis_pano%2Cmake%2Cmodel%2Cthumb_256_url%2Cthumb_1024_url%2Cthumb_original_url%2Cwidth' For more information check: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/500

(https://curator.toolforge.org/#/batches/466). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

PS: Do we already have a function to stop executing batches? --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm looking into the error. There's no function, but I can do a quick hack and set them all as failed, so that they will not be processed. That's a good idea, I'll put that as a feature! Perhaps, can you file a task in Phabricator so we can track that? -- DaxServer (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T413392

 Done I filed one :). I also created a category Category:Curator (Wikibot). There I can put files into to do a tutorial for example, for new users :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey, due to a bug, the batch 467 uploaded 827 files under different titles. The bug is fixed but before re-triggering the batch, the files either need to be renamed to their supposed titles - that seems like the easiest solution to me. If you have other ideas, let me know. -- DaxServer (talk) 22:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Actually, looking at the database, it seems 841 of the 6490 files have distinct titles and thus the remaining are failing. It seems they are just genuinely duplicates. The app should also show this error to the user and should only accept different upload titles and images. Seems like the next work item is already in queue for me 😅 -- DaxServer (talk) 22:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer It was my fault. The problem is that within one second, several images were taken. I forgot the millisecond parameter in this batch. This is why several files were upload to one filename (549230880699800 and 1687894271665497 were uploaded to "Mapillary (6QhgUkS1vHDp4WfOlVdBT3) (bct) 2023-03-20 17H58M17S.jpg", for example. :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Maybe we can include parameters like millisecond in the standard template (following by the image ID or so) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:53, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung - DOP - 543000 5269000 (2003).tif

File:Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung - DOP - 543000 5269000 (2003).tif has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung - DOP - 5430… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Berlinschneid (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grundschule Krötenbruck im Winter 20251230 HOF4186-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:35, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3915-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice scene. --Augustgeyler 18:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3933-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 23:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3945-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grundschule Krötenbruck im Winter 20251230 HOF4186-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:35, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3915-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice scene. --Augustgeyler 18:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3933-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 23:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3945-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carolinenquelle, Hohenberg an der Eger 20251227 HOF3717 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (purple fringes). Also not sure about the white balance. --Plozessor 03:20, 30 December 2025 (UTC)  Done Thanks, done --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hutschenreuther-Infotafel in Hohenberg an der Eger 20251227 HOF3788 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (purple fringes) on the top and left side. --Plozessor 03:19, 30 December 2025 (UTC)  Done Thanks, done --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3967 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:45, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4239 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:09, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Meine Sortierung der Mapillary-Uploads & Dank

Lieber PantheraLeo1359531, ich hoffe, es ist okay, wenn ich das hier kurz erkläre - auch der Transparenz halber. Wir hatten ja schon ein paar nette Berührungspunkte auf Commons, deshalb schreibe ich dir einfach offen :)

In den vergangenen Wochen habe ich mich immer wieder mit der Sortierung sehr voller "Photographs taken on …"-Kategorien beschäftigt. Dabei bin ich regelmäßig auf größere Mengen der von dir auf Commons importierten Mapillary-Bilder gestoßen, die aufgrund des {{Taken on}}-Templates gesammelt in den Tages-Hauptkategorien gelandet waren.

Um diese Kategorien etwas zu entlasten, habe ich die Dateien jeweils auf Dateiebene in passende regionale Unterkategorien (z.B. Bavaria, Germany, United States usw.) einsortiert. Das war eher eine pragmatische Aufräumarbeit im Rahmen der allgemeinen Kategoriesortierung, nicht ein gezielter Eingriff in deine Uploads.

Erst heute ist mir klar geworden, dass sich das Ganze deutlich eleganter und nachhaltiger lösen lässt, nämlich auf Kategorieebene: also cat=no im Taken-on-Template und dafür eine passende regionale "… photographs taken on …"-Kategorie, direkt in der jeweiligen Mapillary-Kategorie. So hätte man sich viele Einzelverschiebungen auf Dateiebene sparen können - dein späteres Vorgehen in diese Richtung ist daher absolut sinnvoll.

Manche Uploads hatten ja bereits eigene Subkategorien, z.B. "United States". Dadurch landen die Dateien aktuell sowohl in der Unterkategorie "United States photographs taken on …" als auch in der Hauptkategorie "Photographs taken on …". Das ist technisch korrekt, kann aber zu einer leichten Überkategorisierung führen. In solchen Fällen werde ich zukünftig einfach das Template-Parameter cat=no setzen - dann verschwinden die Dateien aus der obersten Ebene, bleiben aber sauber in der Unterkategorie erhalten.

Falls dir künftig wieder einmal eine Mapillary-Kategorie auffällt, bei der noch meine alten Dateikategorisierungen vorhanden sind oder eine Überkategorisierung entstehen könnte, sag mir einfach kurz Bescheid. Ich kann dann gesammelt über das Visual File Change Tool die Location-Parameter zurücknehmen und stattdessen cat=no setzen. Alternativ kannst du das natürlich auch selbst anpassen - mir geht es dabei vor allem um eine saubere und langfristig gut wartbare Struktur.

Ganz unabhängig davon möchte ich dir wirklich danken: Deine Mapillary-Importe finde ich großartig. Es ist fantastisch, dass wir auf Commons so eine frei lizenzierte, weltweit verfügbare "Street-View"-ähnliche Dokumentation haben. Das ist für mich eine absolute Bereicherung - und es macht Freude zu sehen, wie liebevoll und aufmerksam du diese Uploads betreust. Vielen Dank, dass du dir die Mühe machst und damit Commons auf so besondere Weise bereicherst :)

Ganz herzliche Grüße, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Hallo @Radomianin, herzlichen Dank für deine lieben Worte :D. Ja, das ist ein wichtiger Punkt, den du da ansprichst. Jeder Upload über das Curator-Uploadtool, das der sehr fleißige User DaxServer geschrieben hat, kategorisiert die Dateien schon automatisch ein (Photographs taken on YYYY-MM-DD). Ich kann gerne vorschlagen, eine Funktion einzubauen, die die automatische Kategorisierung überschreibt, wenn konkrete Kategorieangaben vorhanden sind. Den Templateparameter gucke ich mir gerne an, vielleicht kann ich das gleich so mit übernehmen :).

Ich melde mich, falls ich etwas Entsprehendes finde.

Danke für die netten Worte :D. Ich bin tatsächlich auch erst 2025 auf Mapillary gestoßen und war verblüfft von der Fülle an Bildern (ca. 3 Mrd. oder so?) :). Zu Beginn musste ich das Bildmaterial noch mit einem Python-Skript herunterladen und auf Commons wieder hochladen, das war etwas aufwendig. Aber mit dem neuen Tool geht das deutlich besser.

Ich hoffe, dass das Tool bald von etlichen Usern genutzt wird, um eine systematische Erfassung vieler bedeutsamer Orte zu erreichen. Ich fokussiere mich neben persönlichen Interessen auf gefährdete, besondere oder zerstörte Orte wie Nordkorea, Grönland, Gaza, Lahaina, Ahrtal, oder den ehemaligen Bereich vom Tagebau Garzweiler.

Ich habe auch das Gefühl, dass das Bewusstsein wächst, dass auch digitale Dateien gefährdet sind, das möchte ich auch abdecken, aber es gibt noch viel zu tun :).

Falls dir noch irgendwas auffällt, sage mir bitte Bescheid, dann gucke ich rein. Manche Strukturen kristallisieren sich auch später heraus, und bei mehreren Hunderttausend bis Millionen Dateien verliert man dann den Überblick :D. Schön, dass du dabei bist und liebe Grüße!

PS: Ich habe mir auch paar Gedanken zu den Meinungsbildern der FPCs aus Mödlareuth gemacht. Das Foto vom Grenzpfeiler empfand ich zunächst zu schlicht, aber vielleicht ist genau das in Verbindung mit der Symbolträchtigkeit umso bedeutsamer :). Ich arbeite mal potenzielle Kandidaten Stück für Stück ab und mal sehen, was dabei herauskommt. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:58, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Addendum: Bemerkenswert und nachvollziehbar ist auch die Tatsache, dass bspw. keine Bilder der Ukraine aufrufbar sind. Das ist schade für Orte um Tschernobyl, aber natürlich auch aus sicherheitsrelevanten Gründen nachvollziehbar --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:00, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

• Lieber PantheraLeo1359531, vielen Dank für deine ausführliche und offene Antwort - das freut mich wirklich sehr zu lesen :) Deine Erläuterungen zum Curator-Uploadtool und zur automatischen Tageskategorisierung sind absolut nachvollziehbar. Genau an dieser Schnittstelle bin ich bei meinen Aufräumarbeiten in den übervollen "Photographs taken on …"-Kategorien immer wieder über größere Mengen Mapillary-Dateien gestolpert - daher auch mein pragmatisches Vorgehen auf Dateiebene in den vergangenen Wochen.

Daß du überlegst, im Tool selbst eine Logik einbauen zu lassen, die vorhandene konkrete Kategorien berücksichtigt bzw. die Tageskategorie mit dem Parameter |cat=no überschreibt, fände ich sehr gut. Das wäre aus meiner Sicht tatsächlich eine sehr elegante Lösung für größere Mengen an Dateien.

Für bereits von mir vorgenommene Dateikategorisierungen gilt: Falls du künftig in Mapillary-Kategorien zusätzliche regionale Unterkategorien (z.B. Bavaria, Germany, United States etc.) ergänzt und dir dabei auffällt, daß ich früher schon auf Dateiebene eingegriffen habe, sag mir gerne kurz Bescheid. Ich kann dann gezielt prüfen und - wo sinnvoll - gesammelt auf |cat=no im {{Taken on}}-Template umstellen, um Überkategorisierungen zu vermeiden. Bei kleineren Mengen ist das aus meiner Sicht unkritisch, bei mehreren tausend Dateien lohnt sich die saubere Lösung auf Kategorieebene aber sehr. In diesem Bearbeitungsbeispiel meines gestrigen VFC-Batches war die Datei bereits beim Upload korrekt der Kategorie "United States photographs taken on …" zugeordnet. Um eine Überkategorisierung in der übergeordneten Tageskategorie zu vermeiden, habe ich daher lediglich den Parameter |cat=no im {{Taken on}}-Template ergänzt.

Deine inhaltliche Motivation finde ich übrigens ausgesprochen stark. Der Fokus auf gefährdete, besondere oder zerstörte Orte - und auch der Gedanke, daß selbst digitale Bilder als Zeitdokumente gefährdet sein können - trifft bei mir einen Nerv. Daß bestimmte Regionen wie die Ukraine aktuell fehlen, ist traurig, aber natürlich verständlich. Umso wertvoller sind andere schwer zugängliche oder selten dokumentierte Orte. Wer weiß, vielleicht tauchen ja irgendwann sogar Mapillary-Aufnahmen aus der Antarktis oder ähnlichen Regionen auf.

Und ganz nebenbei: Danke auch für deine Gedanken zu den geplanten FP-Kandidaten aus Mödlareuth. Gerade bei solchen Motiven liegt für mich die Stärke oft in der Schlichtheit und Symbolik - schön, daß du dich damit so aufmerksam auseinandersetzt.

Danke dir für dein Engagement und den freundlichen Austausch - und melde dich jederzeit, wenn ich irgendwo unterstützen oder etwas erklären kann. Herzliche Grüße, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

@Radomianin

Perfekt, dann mache ich das so :). Übergangsweise werde ich wahrscheinlich erst die Dateien hochladen, und sobald ein Batch fertig ist, via VFC den Parameter setzen, bis die Funktion implementiert ist. Gegenwärtig dürften wir noch wenige Batches haben, die mehr als 1000 Dateien umfassen, da diese Funktion relativ frisch ist, also müssten da wenige Elemente betroffen sein.

Die Antarktis dürfte in geringen Teilen auch bereits Inhalte haben, ich kann sie gerne zeitnah hochladen :). Tatsächlich lässt sich das Bewusstsein für gefährdete Inhalte auch grafisch darstellen: File:Unique data of the Internet Archive 20260105.svg und File:Zuwachs der Datenmenge auf Commons pro Jahr in Terabyte 20250322.svg. Die 2020er sind enorme Zugpferde. Auch Leute wie das Archive Team sichern wie verrückt.

Große Herausforderungen werden Plattformen wie Google (Maps) oder Instagram sein, die nicht so einfach zu sichern sind (Crawling wird mit Sperren versehen, und automatisierte Prozesse streng überwacht), aber leider auch sehr viel wichtige Bilder haben... Meine Heimatstadt hat mir auch bereits geschrieben, dass sie ihre auf Social Media veröffentlichten Inhalte extra noch mal archivieren möchten; das ist dringend nötig (siehe Datensouveränität). Ich danke Dir und werde bei Gelegenheit auf Dich zukommen ;)

Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:14, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Gott sei Dank ist die bloße Speicherkapazität nicht mehr so das Problem, da lassen sich relativ gut machbar einige Petabyte sichern --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:15, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

• Lieber PantheraLeo1359531, vielen Dank für deine durchdachte Rückmeldung - das liest sich wirklich gut und macht Freude. Dein vorgeschlagenes Vorgehen klingt absolut sinnvoll. Übergangsweise nach einem Batch via VFC den Parameter zu setzen, ist aus meiner Sicht ein sehr guter und pragmatischer Weg, bis die Funktion ggf. direkt im Upload-Tool greift. Gerade jetzt, wo die größeren Batches noch überschaubar sind, lässt sich das gut handhaben.

Gerade eben habe ich ein konkretes Beispiel umgesetzt: Bei der Kategorie Photographs of Tiraspol from Mapillary (…) habe ich bei 401 Dateien das Parameter |cat=no im {{Taken on}}-Template ergänzt, da die Kategorie bereits korrekt in der Länderkategorie Moldova photographs taken on … lag, aber die Fotos zusätzlich noch in der Hauptkategorie Photographs taken on … erschienen sind. Genau hier zeigt sich, wie hilfreich es ist, das Thema frühzeitig mitzudenken, um unnötige Überkategorisierungen zu vermeiden. Ich finde es sehr gut, daß wir das jetzt offen besprechen und sich das |cat=no-Parameter perspektivisch bereits während der Upload-Batches berücksichtigen lässt - das erspart später viel Aufräumarbeit und sorgt für eine langfristig saubere Struktur.

Auch deine Gedanken zu gefährdeten digitalen Inhalten und den Grafiken finde ich extrem spannend. Gerade Plattformen wie Google Maps oder Instagram sind in dieser Hinsicht echte Sorgenkinder, obwohl dort so viel zeitgeschichtlich relevantes Material liegt. Umso wichtiger ist das, was du hier auf Commons aufbaust. Danke dir für den offenen Austausch und dein Vertrauen - und sehr gerne, melde dich jederzeit. Ich bin froh, daß wir hier gemeinsam an einer guten Lösung arbeiten :) Herzliche Grüße, -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

@Radomianin Perfekt! Gut, dass du so zeitnah auf mich zugekommen bist, da lässt sich das Thema schnell korrigieren :). Zumindest mit dem Bewusstsein um die Gefährdung sind wir schon einen Schritt weiter.

Ich weiß, dass zumindest einige Instagram-Inhalte schon massenarchiviert werden; bei Google Maps fehlen leider noch gute Programme, die das automatisiert können, jedoch gibt es Programme/Skripte, die massenhaft Street View-Panoramen herunterladen können. Wenn es sich gut entwickelt, können wir vielleicht in 5–10 Jahren gute Entwicklungen sehen, die wir noch nicht abschätzen können.

Wichtig ist eben, den Leuten zu zeigen, was es für Möglichkeiten gibt und warum das wichtig ist.

Laut Serverabfrage entfallen auf mein Konto etwa 2,5 Mio. Uploads bei knapp 150 TB und da denke ich auch manchmal, ob das nicht etwas viel ist, allerdings bilden ein Großteil hochqualitative Inhalte wie Luftbilder, Kartenmaterial oder eben Straßenfotos von Mapillary und die WMF sollte solche Datenmengen auch noch verarbeiten können (bei der Sammelleidenschaft muss man sich auch stets überprüfen, ob die Inhalte brauchbar genug sind). Kritisch könnte es erst bei mehreren Petabyte sein, wenn sie sich ziemlich schnell ergießen könnten. Mir fällt übrigens auch noch mindestens ein Nutzer auf Commons ein, der sich um Langzeitarchivierung Gedanken macht. Ein sogenannter "Longtermist" :). Also wir sind nicht alleine. Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:58, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

• Lieber PantheraLeo1359531, danke dir - das freut mich sehr zu lesen :) Gut zu wissen, daß wir da in dieselbe Richtung denken. Allein das gemeinsame Bewusstsein für diese Themen ist schon ein großer Schritt. Die Zahlen sind beeindruckend, aber gerade bei der Qualität und Relevanz der Inhalte sehe ich das entspannt - genau dafür ist Commons ja da. Und schön zu wissen, daß wir mit den Langzeitgedanken nicht alleine sind ;) Danke für den offenen Austausch und bis bald – ich melde mich, wenn mir wieder etwas auffällt. Herzlich, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

  Alles Gute, bis dahin :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigmundsgraben 24 20251219 HOF3054 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:18, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gehöft Haag 20251213 HOF2856 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:42, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mautstation am Felbertauerntunnel 20180819 DSC01830 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:53, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umgebung der Carolinenquelle, Hohenberg an der Eger 20251227 HOF3760 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The same as the neighbour image: multiple CA (purple fringes), also WB issues. --Екатерина Борисова 03:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)  Done Thanks, done --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC) Purple fringes have become less bright, but they are still visible. I don't think that it's QI, sorry Maybe someone else has other opinion. --Екатерина Борисова 01:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality for me --Юрий Д.К. 16:32, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:55, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ortsschild Hof bei Hopfgarten in Defereggen 22082018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 10:59, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-22 Hopfgarten in Defereggen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 11:04, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Abriss der Stadtbibliothek Naila HOF5121 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Abriss der Stadtbibliothek Naila HOF5134-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Weststraße 1, Sparkasse HOF5359-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Jugendtreff JuNaited HOF5355 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-19 Theater Hof im Winter HOF5504 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-19 Theater Hof im Winter HOF5500 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-19 Freizeitanlage Bahnhof Neuhof HOF5568 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very detailed panorama. --Augustgeyler 19:17, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-19 Ballerina von Otmar Alt am Theater Hof HOF5480 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-16 Sony FE 16–35 mm F2.8 GM II HOF4929-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-16 Sony FE 16–35 mm F2.8 GM II HOF5006-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gooq quality. --Laitche 20:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-16 Sony FE 16–35 mm F2.8 GM II HOF5011-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gooq quality. --Laitche 20:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-16 Sony FE 16–35 mm F2.8 GM II HOF5046-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AVDLCZ 21:19, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Auensee Joditz im Winter HOF5887 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 20:34, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Auensee Joditz im Winter HOF5910 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:54, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Auensee Joditz im Winter HOF5915 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:49, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Scharten HOF5680 RAW-Export 1 cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 12:42, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Auensee Joditz im Winter HOF5842 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Joditz im Winter HOF5780 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:00, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Joditz im Winter HOF5774 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, I like the composition --FlocciNivis 21:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Joditz im Winter HOF5727 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 15:45, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Help with valued image nomination

Hello! I've just created this nomination for valued image. I find the instructions terrible confusing, even contradictory. Do you know what's the next step to do, once the nomination page is created? Thanks in advance :) MGeog2022 (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

I believe it's done now: it shows in the candidates list. This text was causing confusion to me:

To complete the nomination:

Copy the following customized text:

|{{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}

Paste the text at the BOTTOM of the Valued image candidate list just above the line that reads, ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE.

I didn't do that, and I wasn't able to successfully find the place, but I edited the list as said here and here, and it seems it's OK now. MGeog2022 (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

@MGeog2022 Yes I agree. I didn't nominate there for a longer time, as the featured status can change when new images come. But the image shows now on the nom page and the format seems to fit. Good job :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:56, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response! Good, so it's OK now, then. MGeog2022 (talk) 13:58, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Joditz im Winter HOF5982 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Joditz im Winter HOF5831 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

National Agriculture Imagery Program - Satellit oder Befliegung?

Guten Morgen @PantheraLeo1359531, mit diesen fachlichen Fragen kennst Du Dich bestimmt besser aus als ich – es geht um die Kategorisierung der Kategorie National Agriculture Imagery Program. Die liegt momentan unter Satellite pictures of the United States. Mir scheint diese Zuordnung nicht zuzutreffen. Denn wenn ich es recht sehe, wurden die NAIP-Bilder primär per Befliegung gewonnen und nicht aus Satellitendaten. Was meinst Du dazu? Falls es keine Satellitenbilder sind, wäre quasi der Weg frei, eine Kategorie für Digitale Orthophotos der USA zu erstellen und die NAIP-Oberkategorie entsprechend umzusortieren. Einen schönen Sonntag wünscht Fl.schmitt (talk) 08:00, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@Fl.schmitt Danke, Dir natürlich auch ;). Ja, das sind Hundert Pro Befliegungen. Diese werden (wurden?) von der Surdex Corporation durchgeführt. Hierbei wird geachtet, dass die Befliegung bei wolkenschwachen Zeitpunkten durchgeführt wird. Von Seiten der NOAA selbst wird von "flying season" gesprochen, also geht es ziemlich sicher um Befliegungen ;). Liebe Grüße und angenehmes Wochende! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:04, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Joditz im Winter HOF5818 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-25 Joditz im Winter HOF5785 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	excellent image. Aditi.Anand.Is.A.Bear (talk) 01:10, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

@Aditi.Anand.Is.A.Bear Thanks! Which image was for you excellent? :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

[Mandelbulb Vertiefung HQ 8K OpenCL 20200510.png], as it was very cultural and educational. Your images are overall underrated too, and as a teen in the UK, I use your images as examples for school projects. Thank you! Aditi.Anand.Is.A.Bear (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@Aditi.Anand.Is.A.Bear Cool, thank you a lot for that ;). Glad to hear these images are useful for you :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Haus der Diakonie in Naila HOF5318 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:28, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Kreuzung Hauptstraße, Weststraße, Anger Naila HOF5371 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:28, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Nailaer Gründerpark HOF5394 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:03, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Nailaer Stadtwappen HOF5265 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laitche 20:10, 13 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 St. Veit Naila HOF5316 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Bürobedarf Mohr Naila HOF5441 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ROCKY 04:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Naila HOF5186-HDR RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:50, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-14 Rückseite des MEDIONPC MS-7728 HOF6383-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Would you be interested in importing some media?

Most of the content on [1] is licensed under CC-BY or CC-0, as far as I can tell. They have a partial API. Is this something you can do? JayCubby (talk) 17:15, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @JayCubby, this is an interesting resource!

I looked through it, however, we have some challenges involved. First of all, we would need to gain all relevant download links (seems doable), in connection with the retrieval of all license information for each video (more challenging). Then, all the videos need to be converted from MP4 to WebM. So, manual input would be needed, and unfortunately, it takes time. Or do we have a link list with all relevant information and access to WebM videos? --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't think there are WebMs provided, so that would definitely be a pain to transcode. File descriptions should be in the enormous media.jsonl files within the zips, but I can open them for about a second before getting OOM errors. Video2Commons works with some manual input for individual files. JayCubby (talk) 20:59, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@JayCubby Maybe I can look deeper into that tomorrow. It would be useful educational resources, but the transcode is a bit of challenging --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:49, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

@JayCubby I am sorry, but I am afraid that I didn't find the time to look deeper into that. You may file a request at COM:Batch uploading (if not done already) :). All the best! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Marktplatz Naila HOF5429 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:59, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Kreuzung Hauptstraße, Walchstraße, Bahnhofstraße Naila HOF5437 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-20 Rote Fußgängerampel an Poststraße HOF6523 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:52, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-20 Uhrenturm des "Besenstalls" HOF6669 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:59, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-20 Drahtesel in Hofer Altstadt HOF6733 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 00:30, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Photo Challenge: First Aid

Hallo PantheraLeo,

über deine kürzlichen QI-Nominierungen bin ich auf deine Fotoserie zum 1. Hofer Eisbaden am Untreusee 2026 aufmerksam geworden. Da sie nicht zuletzt in Bezug auf den DLRG zahlreiche sehr gute Aufnahmen enthält, wäre es eventuell eine Überlegung wert, ein paar Bilder daraus bei der diesmonatigen Photo Challenge zum Thema First Aid einzureichen. Auch wenn sie Erste Hilfe nicht im engsten Sinne abbilden, würde ich sie dennoch als grundsätzlich zum Thema passend einschätzen (unter den bisherigen Einreichungen befinden sich beispielsweise u. a. Aufnahmen von SAR-Schiffen).

Gibt es übrigens einen speziellen Grund dafür, dass du die Fotoserie im PNG-Format exportiert hast?

Liebe Grüße! --Aciarium (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Hallo @Aciarium, danke Dir für Deinen Beitrag :). Ich gucke gerne mal drüber.

Die PNG-Arbeit hat mehrere Gründe. Ich nehme es als Archivformat. Zum einen ist damit ein Upload in 16bit pro Kanal möglich, falls darunter wertvolle Bilder sind. Es unterstützt eine Option zur Speicherung in echtem HDR, und PNG speichert verlustfrei. So können andere und ich Änderungen an der Originalqualität vornehmen, ohne dass mit jeder Speicherung mehr Artefakte entstehen. Es ist zwar richtig, dass in höchster Speicherqualität für das menschlich Auge wohl kaum Unterschiede entstehen, aber dadurch, dass JPEG in Blöcken speichert und gerade um den absoluten Weiß- und Schwarzwert komprimiert, werden Farbwerte verändert. Es gäbe noch einige, wenige Gründe, aber das ist so das Grobe. Liebe Grüße :) --09:15, 23 February 2026 (UTC) PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:15, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@PantheraLeo1359531: Danke für deine Erklärung, das war mir in dem Ausmaß nicht bewusst. PNG im Fotobereich habe ich persönlich immer aufgrund des Stigmas der Dateigröße vermieden, aber die scheint angesichts der von dir geschilderten Vorteile (bei qualitativ sehr hochwertigen Fotos) ja ein durchaus vertretbarer Preis zu sein – wieder was dazugelernt! Insbesondere den Archivierungs- und Weiternutzungsgedanken finde ich lobenswert. :) Liebe Grüße! --Aciarium (talk) 09:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@Aciarium Das ist tatsächlich eine verständliche Sichtweise. Ich möchte mit paar Informationen das alles einordnen: Ich habe um 2011 mit einer 5-MP-Kamera hantiert, die JPEG-Bilder mit etwa 2 MB ausgespuckt hat. Damals war Speicherplatz ein größeres Thema – erst 4 Jahre zuvor kam die erste 1-TB-HDD auf dem Markt, zu einem entsprechenden Preis. Heutige Smartphone-Fotos (ca. 50 bis 100 MP) sind gerne mal 20 bis 40 MB groß. Aktuelle professionelle Vollformatkameras schießen in RAW mit etwa 60 bis 125 MB pro Foto. Das ist natürlich ein enormer Anstieg, allerdings haben wir auch bspw. mittlerweile superflotte 4 bis 8 TB große SSDs, und ggf. Festplatten bis zu 30 TB pro Stück ;). Je nach Speicherform kann ein hochauflösendes HDR-Foto gerne mal 400 bis 600 MB groß sein (32 bit pro Kanal). Ich habe mit dem Transfer von Orthophotos zu tun, da haben wir meist 4 Farbkanäle pro Bild bei 25 bis etwa 200 MP pro Bild, teils sogar 500 MP. Dort haben wir Dateigrößen von 60 MB über 500 MB bis hin zu knapp 3 GB pro Bild!

Also es kommt sehr an, welchen Maßstab wir ansetzen und was sinnvoll ist. Bei älteren Fotos und Handyfotos arbeite ich generell mit JPEG, da die jeweiligen Kameramodelle nicht immer die Auflösung ausreizen können. Also ob wir da mit verlustfreier Qualität oder minimalstem Verlust durch JPEG arbeiten – wir haben praktisch keinen optischen Detailverlust. Mit aktuellen Vollformatkameras und guten Objektiven kannst du die Sensorauflösung doch durchaus ausreizen, sodass es hier sinnvoller ist. Wenn du mit einer Systemkamera einen blauen Himmel fotografierst, so wird ohne weitere Bearbeitungen das Foto einfach einen blauen Farbgradienten haben. Wenn du jedoch Kontrast und andere Parameter äußerst extrem übersteuerst, kannst du teils kreisförmige Muster sehen, die mit bloßem Auge nicht sichtbar sind. Das könnte man als "Fingerprint" des Kamerasensors und des Objektivs sehen (und damit als Authentizitätsmerkmal). Kleinere Kompressionen können das Muster kaputtmachen. Das geht schon fast in die digitale Forensik rein, aber das zeigt, was alles möglich ist :).

Aber in der Praxis, solange du nicht mehrere Hunderttausende bis Millionen Fotos in größerer Dateigröße hochlädst, würde das wahrscheinlich nicht mal mit PNG-Qualität und hiermit größerer Datenmenge auffallen. Commons überschreitet nun fast die 1000-Terabyte-Marke; alleine 1 TB nur durch eigene Bilder hochzuschaufeln, dauert. Und in der heutigen Zeit (die Zeit vergeht, schon 2026) ist die bloße Speicherkapazität quasi kein bedenkliches Thema mehr. Die WMF kann genug Infrastruktur bereitstellen, und Commons kann auch Zuwächse von 2TB+ pro Tag stemmen. Das Internet Archive, zum Vergleich, hat mittlerweile wohl über 200 PB (200.000 Terabyte) an einzigartigen Daten.

Es ist richtig, dass JPEG für Fotos wegen der effizienten Kompression hier gerne gesehen wird, aber Commons ist eben auch ein Archiv, und ein Archiv sieht grundsätzlich gerne die Originalqualität ;). Wir haben heute teils das Problem, dass wir seit 2005 oder 2007 keine aktualisierten Fotos haben, und die Fotos noch 640×480 Pixel haben, was heutzutage ärgerlich ist (damals war die Internetverbindung teils noch bei 64kbit/s). In der Zukunft werden etwas größere Datenmengen nur ein Schulterzucken verursachen, aber nicht die dadurch (etwas) bessere verfügbare Qualität. Und JPEGs kann man von PNGs und TIFFs immer noch anlegen, wenn das sinnvoller ist. Viel Spaß beim Lesen und liebe Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:06, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Sehr interessante Ausführung, ich kann dir da prinzipiell nur zustimmen! :) Ich musste selbst vor ein paar Jahren beim Umstieg von APS-C auf Vollformat feststellen, dass der Zuwachs in der durchschnittlichen Dateigröße eigentlich in keinem Verhältnis zum deutlichen Gewinn an Bildqualität steht. Dasselbe würde ich für den Vergleich zwischen der α7- und α7R-Serie behaupten, wo man gerade im Hobbybereich gelegentlich ein Leidklagen von α7R-Nutzern über die Dateigröße ihrer Fotos vernimmt (was natürlich durch die immer bessere Verfügbarkeit großer Speichermedien, wie du sie angesprochen hast, zunehmend entkräftigt wird). Und klar, Orthofotos, HDR-Bilder und aus zahlreichen Einzelbildern zusammengestellte Panoramen entschärfen den Speicherplatzbedarf einer einzelnen Bilddatei noch weiter. :) Auf jeden Fall sehr interessante Denkanstöße!

Wenn ich schon dabei bin, möchte ich noch eine weitere Frage loswerden: Deinen Uploads nach dokumentierst du Hof und das Hofer Lokalgeschehen ja sehr ausführlich, u. a. in Bezug auf zahlreiche örtliche Events (wie das früher erwähnte Eisbaden, sowie Sportveranstaltungen, etc.). Wie hälst du dich auf dem Laufenden, welche Anlässe spannend zum Fotografieren sind? Und fotografierst du bei solchen Events als Privatperson, oder lässt du dich dafür akkreditieren? Ich hoffe, das wirkt jetzt nicht zu indiskret – mich interessiert lediglich, wie andere Commons-Nutzer mit dem Thema Veranstaltungsfotografie im weiteren Sinne umgehen, weil ich so etwas prinzipiell auch bei mir in der Region ganz gerne machen würde. :) LG, Aciarium (talk) 10:11, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@Aciarium Danke für Deinen Beitrag ;). Das ist tatsächlich unterschiedlich. In vielen Fällen kann man einfach hingehen, und paar Fotos machen. Bei manchen Fällen kennt man vielleicht Leute, die einem weiterhelfen, oder man bekommt Erlaubnisse. Oft sind aber die Leute aufgeschlossen :). Über die Zeit erhält man so manche Quellen, wo man erfährt, was gerade los ist, oder man bekommt was zugesandt. Vieles entwickelt sich auch so über die Zeit, und manche sind auch denkbar, wenn man paar Fotos macht, gerade, wie bei Commons, wenn sie sie auch nutzen dürfen. Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:39, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-21 1. Hofer Eisbaden am Untreusee HOF6950 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:37, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-21 1. Hofer Eisbaden am Untreusee HOF6877 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:37, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-21 1. Hofer Eisbaden am Untreusee HOF6786 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:37, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-21 1. Hofer Eisbaden am Untreusee HOF6777 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:37, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3977 RAW-Export.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3977 RAW-Export.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-02-24 Gedenktag zum 4. Jahrestag des großflächigen Krieges gegen die Ukraine HOF7404 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me.--Jebulon 23:07, 26 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Vitorperrut555 01:47, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Presets on Curator

Hey! I just deployed an update with Presets in beta (limited to you and myself). Could you test it and give me some feedback on how it works and what can be improved? Thanks! Have a great Sunday! -- DaxServer (talk) 10:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

The idea of creating a list for presets is a very useful and splendid one! I made a test and experienced one problem. The creating and executing of the preset does work, but I was not able to close (see File:2026-03-01 Curator-Presets Screenshot 2026-03-01 122355.png) the preset window. I tried with clicking by mouse and hitting keys on the keyboard :(. A good sunday and all the best! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

I fixed that ;) -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer

Thanks! The list of managable presets is a very splendid idea! I have made some tests. When I click a saved preset File:2026-03-01 Curator – Preset auswählen Screenshot 2026-03-01 212000.png, then only the row with the preset appears (File:2026-03-01 Curator – Preset ausgewählt Screenshot 2026-03-01 212007.png). I suggest that the title template and category field (like here File:2026-02-11 17 08 47 – Curator title template.png) would still appear (after I chose a preset), but depicted with the preset content. This would allow to make smaller changes without changing the original preset or to choose to skip it.

And we have a little bug: When I try to make changes or a preview of the preset, the custom title template (as seen here in the preset name File:2026-03-01 Curator – Preset auswählen Screenshot 2026-03-01 212000.png) falls back to the standard title template. It should still have the preset version. Hope that helps :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:32, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Super, danke! I'll look into them over the weekend. I'll be at Wikimedia Hackathon Northwestern Europe 2026 next week, I'll most likely work on Curator as well. Perhaps create some tasks in Phabricator that you think would improve the app? Bis dann! -- DaxServer (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Sehr fleißig! First of all, I wish you a splendid time and I will think about some topics :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:40, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

About MandelBox

Hey, thanks for upload this awesome work! I been wondering if This image but at 25000x25000 resolution is the original image from Krzysztof? I can't help but notice that the transparent one is brighter which I am not sure if it was edited or has higher color depth. It is really awesome image to benchmarking jxl image codec, if you have the original one please share it with me, Thanks! Will1am xe (talk) 18:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

@Will1am xe Hi! Happy to hear ;). The image is rendered by an example that comes with the software Mandelbulber. If you open the program, you can go to File → Load example... → Krzysztof Marczak collection (here you can see the copyright claim and license of CC BY-4.0) → iter fog 1.fract. If you open the file, the settings are loaded. The creative input of Krzysztof Marczak with is the code and composition is licensed via CC BY-4.0. I made some changes in favor of the higher resolution and with this; you can set and render your preferences and set resolution output format, position, etc. I chose 25000×25000 as original format, because it is a resolution that is rendered in an acceptable duration and has a good quality even in the distant future. Hope this helps ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks you! I am aware that it was created from Mandelbulber but I am not so sure of how to use program, and it seem quite demanding too.. good to know it has sample! now I download it and figuring out how to use it, my laptop spiked up everytime I move 😂 Will1am xe (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

@Will1am xe I am sorry, yes, the program should be used with a GPU :D. But at least, the example can be visited as you wish ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Category:Orthophotos of Germany

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,
Ich habe deine Änderungen in dieser Kategorie gesehen. Findest du die Seite einer Kategorie wirklich geeignet für diesen Zweck (speziell mit den ganze REFs)? Aus meiner Sicht wäre das auf einer anderen Seite besser aufgehoben die man von der Kategorie aus verlinken kann. Siehe dazu zB DJI camera model names und Category:Taken with DJI Mavic.
--D-Kuru (talk) 15:40, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

@D-Kuru Du hast Recht, danke für den Input :). Ich habe den Inhalt verschoben. Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Sind das Orthophotos?

Hi @PantheraLeo1359531, während mein Bot noch in den USA vor sich hinwerkelt, mache ich gerade etwas Handarbeit in heimischen Gefilden. Dabei habe ich mich gefragt, ob die Luftbilder in dieser Kategorie ebenfalls Orthophotos sind oder ob man sie lieber als ganz normale Luftbilder behandeln sollte. Du kennst Dich mit der Thematik besser aus als ich - was meinst Du dazu? Die Bilder aus dieser Kategorie sind übrigens fast alle gesüdet, was die Lokalisierung etwas erschwert... Fl.schmitt (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

@Fl.schmitt Fleißig fleißig! Ja, ich habe die Diskussion sporadisch mitbekommen... Orthophotos sind grundsätzlich verzerrungsfreie, maßstabsgetreue Luftbilder, wobei der Kamerasensor (oder im analogen Pendant der Film) orthogonal zum Boden verläuft (bzw. das Licht orthogonal gebrochen wird). Orthophotos sind dann ideal, wenn gerade Oberflächenerhebungen auch im Foto gerade sind (bei Fernsehtürmen sollte man also nicht den Schaft sehen können, wenn eine Plattform diesen verdeckt, oder Hauswände, etc.). Fotos wie dieses erfüllen sicher die Definition; die niedrige Auflösung hilft dabei natürlich. Da es ein Lichtbild ist (Spektralklassen sind hier zweitrangig). Wenn wir hier noch Korinthenkackerei betreiben wollen, sind Dateien wie diese keine Orthophotos, sondern Orthophotomosaike. Also kurzgesagt: ja, sehe ich so. Es sind nur keine DOPs (oder digitalen Orthophotos), da sie nicht mit einem digitalen Kamerasensor (Bayer-Sensor, CMOS, CCD, etc.) geschossen wurden :). Dass keine Nordung vorhanden ist, könnte einem fehlenden Bewusstsein geschuldet sein, denn mittlerweile (gerade in Zeiten der GIS) ist das Gang und Gäbe.

Die Luftbilder von Google Maps sind üblicherweise KEINE Orthophotos, da höhere Strukturen meist schief über das Bild verlaufen. Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:38, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

File:DOP20 CIR Berlin 2010 - 386000 5835000 (Senatskanzlei Berlin).tif

Hallo @PantheraLeo1359531

Ist das tatsächlich eine weisse Seite oder ein Uploadfehler? Beste Grüsse, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 11:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Erg. Okay meine Frage hat sich bereits geklärt, siehe Category:Files from Senatskanzlei Berlin/blank. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 11:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)