User talk:Yann
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
|
/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 6364 65 66 67
- User:Yann/Valued images, 2009-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2019
- User:Yann/Quality images, 2005-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2023
- User:Yann/Featured images, 2009-2018, 2019-2023, 2024-2025
- User:Yann/Featured media
You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A Country Practice Stars
Hello, need help with uploading a file and also I appreciate your kindness and sincerity of you being here to help with the A Country Practice, with the Joyce Jacobs one I had to remove because it was not the actress Joyce Jacobs who played Esme Watson in A Country Practice. I have been searching and wondering if you can upload a picture of Frank Lloyd, the Australian Actor, played Neville McPhee in Home and Away (1928-1995), again unfortunately he has passed, so we should be able to do a fair image. Thank-You again for your assistance and help , I do truly appreciate it, Have a nice day, Kindest Regards Newcumer80 (talk) 06:47, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Hi, Before uploading files copied from the Internet, you need to insure that they are under a free license or in the public domain. Please read COM:L. There are copyright rules specific for each country. For Australia, please see Commons:Australia. In brief, only pictures from before 1955 are in the public domain. You can ask more questions on COM:VPC. Yann (talk) 09:12, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- yes , i know is iss why i ask you to do uit because you know how things work and are more familiar and you are the master and a kind yo help, i have tried a long time, my friend Newcumer80 (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
could you please upload for me and the Frank Lloyd picture and Joyce Jacobs from A Country Practice, please, thankyou Newcumer80 (talk) 13:52, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: No. Please read what I said above. No picture from after 1955 can be uploaded without evidence of a free license from the copyright holder. Yann (talk) 14:00, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- no because hhe actors have passed they would be in the fair use protocol, as a replacement license picture is obviously not possible, wikcommons is a different system under no circumstances do they except copyright images that are not in the public domain , as you mentioned before 1955, unfortunately Joyce passed away in 2013 and Frank Lloyd (1928-1995), and Frank Lloyd in 1995, it it is easy to get confused with the name because there are several people named Frank Lloyd but it was the actor from Home and Away. kind regards Newcumer80 (talk) 14:29, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Fair use is not accepted on Commons. Once again, please read COM:L. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- no, but it is allowed in wikipedia Newcumer80 (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Then please upload it on Wikipedia. Yann (talk) 18:43, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- i dont know how to do that, this is the reason why i asked you, lol Newcumer80 (talk) 19:22, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Please go to en:Wikipedia:File upload wizard, and follow the instructions of "Upload a non-free file". Yann (talk) 19:30, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- i am only going off what you stated?, which was the picture does not have a license, it is expired because the picture was in the public domain because it ended in the country it wa published, so why can't you please upload a more suitable picture that you are happy with, i only ever asked you for help, the picture was to document her early stage career and was an important component. did you find what i stated waso r fair-use was for Frank Lloyd, i didn't state fair-use on the other one, i stated was in now the public domain because it was before 1955 Newcumer80 (talk) 11:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Even if it is in public domain, you have to add a license. You can request undeletion at COM:UDR. Yann (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- i send you message, regards Newcumer80 (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- i have fond out why the THELMA RUBY picture was excepted, even thoughth picture was a press release, and the photographer wa snot identified , they tol dme something about URAA law that was instituted in 1995, even if i use
{{PD-UK-unknown}}tag Newcumer80 (talk) 13:01, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- i have fond out why the THELMA RUBY picture was excepted, even thoughth picture was a press release, and the photographer wa snot identified , they tol dme something about URAA law that was instituted in 1995, even if i use
- i send you message, regards Newcumer80 (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Even if it is in public domain, you have to add a license. You can request undeletion at COM:UDR. Yann (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- i am only going off what you stated?, which was the picture does not have a license, it is expired because the picture was in the public domain because it ended in the country it wa published, so why can't you please upload a more suitable picture that you are happy with, i only ever asked you for help, the picture was to document her early stage career and was an important component. did you find what i stated waso r fair-use was for Frank Lloyd, i didn't state fair-use on the other one, i stated was in now the public domain because it was before 1955 Newcumer80 (talk) 11:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Please go to en:Wikipedia:File upload wizard, and follow the instructions of "Upload a non-free file". Yann (talk) 19:30, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- i dont know how to do that, this is the reason why i asked you, lol Newcumer80 (talk) 19:22, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Then please upload it on Wikipedia. Yann (talk) 18:43, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- no, but it is allowed in wikipedia Newcumer80 (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Newcumer80: Fair use is not accepted on Commons. Once again, please read COM:L. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- no because hhe actors have passed they would be in the fair use protocol, as a replacement license picture is obviously not possible, wikcommons is a different system under no circumstances do they except copyright images that are not in the public domain , as you mentioned before 1955, unfortunately Joyce passed away in 2013 and Frank Lloyd (1928-1995), and Frank Lloyd in 1995, it it is easy to get confused with the name because there are several people named Frank Lloyd but it was the actor from Home and Away. kind regards Newcumer80 (talk) 14:29, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Well can you please help my friend, and the Frank Lloyd picture as well, , if you can only use a licensed picture that is wikicommons, and under no circumstances will they except fair-use but wikipedia does however, under some circumstance if for example the person has passed, and a replacement photo, i is unavailable , like our Frank Lloyd, the only way if the picture is not in the public domain, is to contact the person directly and ask if they are willing to offer a picture, or one that is unlicensed which i dont have a problem with, but considering she Thelma is now nearly 101 years old, in no way what so ever is it respectful or appropriate to contact an elderly lady.that is a certain boundary to set, so it is a matte rof finding one that is more suitable
License review request
Good evening, @Yann! Do you can review license of this file from YouTube? Thanks, PrestigiousLynx4378 (talk) 14:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
Done --Yann (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much!
PrestigiousLynx4378 (talk) 14:17, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much!
- @Yann: another file from YouTube also needs in review. PrestigiousLynx4378 (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- His extracted version also needs in review. PrestigiousLynx4378 (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Done --Yann (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- His extracted version also needs in review. PrestigiousLynx4378 (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann: another files from YouTube also needs in license review. PrestigiousLynx4378 (talk) 06:40, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
- Good morning, @Yann: please, review license of these files: [1][2][3][4][5][6]. PrestigiousLynx4378 (talk) 04:38, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
You have keept this file (File:Zhuravlev.jpg) with a note that there is no reason to delete it. But there was specific reasons in the nomination. And you didn't comment on them or give anу assessment. I think you should give a reasonable assessment before summing up. — Redboston 16:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, Please read the license. Yann (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Which paragraph for classifying it as public domain do you mean? — Redboston 18:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- {{PD-Russia-1996}} Yann (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- This template has 4 paragraphs (and 6 subparagraphs). Which one exactly? — Redboston 22:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- How could you determine the date of the author's death if the author is unknown? — Redboston 22:31, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- {{PD-Russia-1996}} Yann (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Which paragraph for classifying it as public domain do you mean? — Redboston 18:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
"Why are you ignoring Japanese copyright law? Does the Commons policy take precedence over the law? His explanation about the category is completely inaccurate—what does 'as above' even mean in this context? Please explain everything in detail. I always try to make reasonable arguments, but I simply cannot accept this decision." Y.haruo (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Y.haruo: Hi, Sorry, but Jim is right. The argument that the board is de minimis doesn't hold water. It is the central part of the image, and the main reason for it. Yann (talk) 11:19, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- The board happened to be in the center—it was just incidental. Please do not disregard Japanese copyright law. Y.haruo (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- Please take a look at this image File:Louvre at night centered.jpg. On Wikimedia Commons, the central pyramid is explained as being de minimis. Commons de minimis policy does not consider central placement alone as a reason for deletion. Please explain why the file was deleted based on a reason that is not supported by policy.
- I would also appreciate an explanation as to why the revised Japanese copyright law is not being respected. As far as I understand, Commons policy does not permit ignoring national laws. Is there a reason why the laws of countries like Japan are being disregarded? Your decision seems inconsistent with Commons guidelines.
- Your explanation is entirely insufficient to justify your decision. Since you have made such a significant judgment, you have a responsibility to provide a proper and thorough explanation. Please be aware that refusing to engage in dialogue can be grounds for a block or even removal. Thank you for your attention. Y.haruo (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Y.haruo: I don't know the details of Japanese law, but this would not be OK anywhere in the world. The Louvre picture is different: it is not possible to take a picture of the Louvre without having the pyramid in the middle. While it is certainly possible to take a picture of this building without this board. Yann (talk) 20:12, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- I have researched Japanese law and presented my findings. I have confirmed that the photo in question is lawful under Japanese law. However, you dismissed it without even reading my explanation and arbitrarily concluded—based on speculation—that it is unacceptable. Furthermore, your justification for deletion claims that the signboard is the main subject simply because it is a central element, but such a criterion does not exist in the de minimis policy. In order to photograph that part of the gymnasium, the signboard inevitably appears in the frame. Your response remains unreasonable. I cannot accept the way you have handled this matter. Y.haruo (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Y.haruo: Well, if another admin agrees with you, fine. But I don't. Yann (talk) 09:43, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- I have submitted this issue to the Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems for further review. Y.haruo (talk) 04:05, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Y.haruo: Well, if another admin agrees with you, fine. But I don't. Yann (talk) 09:43, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- I have researched Japanese law and presented my findings. I have confirmed that the photo in question is lawful under Japanese law. However, you dismissed it without even reading my explanation and arbitrarily concluded—based on speculation—that it is unacceptable. Furthermore, your justification for deletion claims that the signboard is the main subject simply because it is a central element, but such a criterion does not exist in the de minimis policy. In order to photograph that part of the gymnasium, the signboard inevitably appears in the frame. Your response remains unreasonable. I cannot accept the way you have handled this matter. Y.haruo (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Y.haruo: I don't know the details of Japanese law, but this would not be OK anywhere in the world. The Louvre picture is different: it is not possible to take a picture of the Louvre without having the pyramid in the middle. While it is certainly possible to take a picture of this building without this board. Yann (talk) 20:12, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- The board happened to be in the center—it was just incidental. Please do not disregard Japanese copyright law. Y.haruo (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
CPUG Board Elections 2026 – Voting Now Open
Dear Yann,
You are receiving this message because you are listed as a member of the Commons Photographers User Group and are included in the eligible voter list.
The Election Committee is pleased to invite you to vote in the Board Elections 2026.
- Voting period: 00:00, 26 February 2026 – 23:59, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- Ballot: Go to the voting server
Full details about the candidates are available at: Candidates Overview
All eligible members are strongly encouraged to participate in the election.
For questions or discussion, please use the election talk page.
Unsubscribe / opt-out: If you do not wish to receive further notifications related to the CPUG Board Elections 2026, you may remove your name from the mailing list.
We look forward to your participation.
— CPUG Election Committee - 10:38, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Protect closed adminship requests
@Yann plz protect Commons:Administrators/Requests/Theklan (closed in August 2025) and Commons:Administrators/Requests/Nemoralis (interface administrator) (closed minutes ago by me). Shaan SenguptaTalk 16:50, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- Done for both. --Yann (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Jhonatan Jardim
Ei mano, pô tu vai tirar as minhas coisas que eu botei na Wikipedia também? Tá de sacanagem? Não tem nada de errado em botar as taças da CFU CLUB SHIELD e da Copa Caribe da CONCACAF na Wikipedia mano, tu só tirou porque tu só quis!
Remover coisas minhas da wikipedia Jhonatan Jardim (talk) 19:33, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- Please see answer on your talk page. Yann (talk) 19:43, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Is it possible that the SPA that is nominating the over 100 Polish images is part of a concerted effort to delete Polish history? It seems odd that a new account would dive right into deletions, and nominate so many under similar rationales. The only other activity by the account is to try and get the uploaders banned. I looked to see if there was some previous bad blood between the uploaders and the SPA, but could not find one. The only thing in common in the deletion nominations is that the images are mostly dissidents to the Soviet occupation. RAN (talk) 01:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
- @RAN: This account is already blocked for 2 weeks. It will be blocked again if the behavior continues after the block. Yann (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
- They have two accounts, the other is User:Uniminomum (versus User:Uniminomumm), you warned them already for abuse of the speedy deletion system at that account. --RAN (talk) 20:19, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn't see that. So both accounts blocked. Yann (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
- If ok with you, I am going to make a list of images already deleted, and add to deletion review. I do not have access to deleted images, so I cannot review them myself. Some might be post the 1994 publication cutoff, we won't know until they are reviewed. It looks like a dozen of so were deleted without debate, or with minimal debate. --RAN (talk) 21:46, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Copyright issues
Hey @Yann, on my talk page you left a Copyright violations. I'm new to Wiki commons and I don't really know what went wrong? So to give some context: I uploaded a bulk amount of photo's. I made sure to place the cc's and the tags for all the photos and then proceeded to mail a declaration of consent to wiki commons email. After all of that, I had a mail conversation with an editor about some of the authorships of the photo's and I didn't hear back on what the final decision. Now most of the photos have been taken down and I have plenty of yellow and red templates on my talk page. I don't really know what I did wrong, so if you could clarify I would really appreciate that. kind regards Kev-spa (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Kev-spa: Hi, If you did obtain a permission for a free license from the copyright holder, please add a template
{{subst:PP}}in the permission field of your files. Then you have one month for the copyright holder to send the permission. Anyway, files are never permanently deleted on Commons. They will be undeleted if and when a permission is validated by one of the volunteer from VRT. It can take some time. If you have further questions about VRT, you can ask them on COM:VRT/N. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Copyright?
Hey man, I have cited the Author of the Image, written down its source, check weather they. Have released an image for free use (only for use in non-derogatory ways acc to source) check if it falls within Wikimedia commons policies and then only uploaded it. I don't see why it is still to be rejected.
Can you tell me what I am doing wrong? I also upload from ISRO's webpage and there about half are passed over and the other half (despite being from same page and same author under same license) get deleted.
Is it the way I upload or am I making large amounts of major formatting mistakes? Images I clicked myself have not received any notices like that.
Anticipating your earliest response.
Yours sincerely 4-RAZOR 01 (talk) 04:28, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- @4-RAZOR 01: File:Slns sagara.jpg is from the Sri Lankan Navy, not the Indian Navy. So the license is wrong. Images from the Indian Navy may be OK, but you have to add a license. Please see COM:India. Yann (talk) 09:49, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Okay thanks 4-RAZOR 01 (talk) 10:16, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Will it be much of a hassle if I ever consult you prior to uploading any such (except for own pictures)? 4-RAZOR 01 (talk) 10:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- like in the future? 4-RAZOR 01 (talk) 10:18, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- @4-RAZOR 01: OK, fine. You can also ask on COM:VPC. Yann (talk) 10:26, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! 4-RAZOR 01 (talk) 10:28, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Hi Yann, regarding Commons:Deletion requests/File:Legitymacja PZPR 1JG.jpg I wanted to point out that there were two more images tied to that deletion request that still have their tags:
- File:Jan Gorzelańczyk (1926-2013) in 1975.jpg — Seems this was spun off with the deletion request and everything.
- I just realized these are from two different requests. This one's from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Legitymacja PZPR 2 JG.jpg, but it's still the same scenario.
- File:Jan Gorzelańczyk (1926-2013) in 1968.jpg — Similar situation but the parent seems to be handled.
I wasn't sure what the policy is on removal of these tags by a non-admin so I figured I'd inform you of this instead. I'm curious to know if it would've been okay for me to remove the templates given the scenario or not. Or if there are policy pages that explain the process in detail. Thanks, --Stux (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Done OK. Yann (talk) 16:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm a little confused by the response. Do you mean it's okay for me to go ahead and remove the "nominated for deletion" templates from those two images? Thanks, --Stux (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- I did it. Yann (talk) 07:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Got it. Thank you for clarifying! I was confused last time because when I checked those pages the tags hadn't gone away but now they are gone. Which is weird because I don't see any revisions for adding or removing the templates. I guess those are internally-added tags added by commons? I hadn't placed close-enough attention to see where the tags were coming from. Thanks again! --Stux (talk) 14:13, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Stux: Hi, You can see who edited a file when you click on the History tag (or the equivalent in another language, depending on which language is your interface). Yann (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann: Hi Yann, I did, and that's what confused me. As you can see this history doesn't show any edits from you, yet I clearly remember seeing the Deletion notices that I reported above. Oh, I see now. It looks like Krd took care of them here and here. It confused me not seeing your username on the edits. Anyway, thanks again for your time and help! --Stux (talk) 19:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Stux: Hi, You can see who edited a file when you click on the History tag (or the equivalent in another language, depending on which language is your interface). Yann (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- Got it. Thank you for clarifying! I was confused last time because when I checked those pages the tags hadn't gone away but now they are gone. Which is weird because I don't see any revisions for adding or removing the templates. I guess those are internally-added tags added by commons? I hadn't placed close-enough attention to see where the tags were coming from. Thanks again! --Stux (talk) 14:13, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- I did it. Yann (talk) 07:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm a little confused by the response. Do you mean it's okay for me to go ahead and remove the "nominated for deletion" templates from those two images? Thanks, --Stux (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
User:Yessyesss continues to upload content claiming it to be PD-USGOV
As seen at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Yessyesss&ilshowall=1, Yessyesss continues to upload content which does not appear to be free use. You previously warned the user to stop uploading content they were not allowed to, yet they appear to continue to do so. Two of the files are up for deletion discussion at the moment, and have not received a final verdict, but if they are deleted (as I suspect they will be), then it may be time to bring this up somewhere. I'm not as familiar with Commons, so I wanted to bring it up here first. Raskuly (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a week, two files deleted. Yann (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Discussion at COM:HD#To Jeff G., Achim55, and The Squirrel Conspiracy
You are invited to join the discussion at COM:HD#To Jeff G., Achim55, and The Squirrel Conspiracy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Yann. Maybe you can help this person out. They seem to be asking about an account that you unblocked but are unable to access because they don't know the password or email address for the account. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:50, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Hi, I have seen the discussion, but I can't do anything if they lost the password, and do not have email access. Now this user has created 7 socks, so a proper unblock request with a clear commitment is needed. This should happen to the account talk page, not anywhere else. Yann (talk) 08:23, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- I posted this at the HD already; so, I apologize for being redundant. FWIW, it looks like they did make an unblock request early last month, and you granted it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Hi, I have seen the discussion, but I can't do anything if they lost the password, and do not have email access. Now this user has created 7 socks, so a proper unblock request with a clear commitment is needed. This should happen to the account talk page, not anywhere else. Yann (talk) 08:23, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
User:JaxsonR
I nominated a file (File:2026 Austin bar shooter.png) uploaded by them for deletion, and checked their talk page to make sure that the notice posted, and saw that you had previously warned them as well. The user appears to believe that asking Twitter users (who clearly don't have rights to an image) for permission acts as making it okay to upload it here. Raskuly (talk) 03:41, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
CPUG Board Elections 2026 – Voting Closing Soon
Dear Yann,
You are receiving this message because you are listed as a member of the Commons Photographers User Group and are included in the eligible voter list.
The Election Committee is pleased to invite you to vote in the Board Elections 2026.
- Voting deadline: 7 March 2026 23:59 (UTC)
- Ballot: Go to the voting server
Full details about the candidates are available at: Candidates Overview
All eligible members are strongly encouraged to participate in the election.
For questions or discussion, please use the election talk page.
Unsubscribe / opt-out: If you do not wish to receive further notifications related to the CPUG Board Elections 2026, you may remove your name from the mailing list.
We look forward to your participation.
— CPUG Election Committee - 09:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Alex Neman - again
Hi Yann, can you please check the admin noticeboard. I think i've linked more of Alex Neman's stuff. Also may I please email you, i want to discuss something in private and need some help. --LuvsMG481 (talk) 09:23, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- @LuvsMG481: Yes, sure. Yann (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Klee
Bonjour. As-tu un peu de temps à m’accorder concernant les œuvres de Paul Klee s’il t’a plaît ? Tu m’as laissé un message sur ma pdd et j’ai posé qlq questions. Là peut-on s’il te plaît prendre le temps pour fignoler ensemble qlq détails pour les trois œuvres suivantes :
- 1932, 273 (Polyphonie)
- 1932, 274 (Ad Parnassum)
- 1932, 275 (Gleich Unendlich)
-
Polyphonie, 1932, 273. -
%2C_Paul_Klee_(1932).jpg/250px-Ad_Parnassum_(originaler%2C_gefasster_Holzrahmen)%2C_Paul_Klee_(1932).jpg)
Ad Parnassum, 1932, 274. -
_-_Paul_Klee_(Museum_of_Modern_Art%2C_New_York).png/250px-Equals_Infinity_(1932)_-_Paul_Klee_(Museum_of_Modern_Art%2C_New_York).png)
Egale infini, 1932, 275.
,_Paul_Klee_(1932).jpg)
_-_Paul_Klee_(Museum_of_Modern_Art,_New_York).png)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_-_01.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_-_02.jpg){kind=link}
_-_02_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Роман_Гриньків_(2024-07-07).jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Роман_Гриньків_(2024-07-07)_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Тарас_Петриненко_(2023-11-04).jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Тарас_Петриненко_(2023-11-04)_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Євген_Лацік_(2025-03-26).jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Євген_Лацік_(2025-03-26)_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
-20260228013600-File:Czesław_Czubryt-Borkowski.jpg){kind=link}
_in_1975.jpg){kind=link}
_in_1968.jpg){kind=link}
_in_1975.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
_in_1968.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=1175149653){kind=link}
_in_1975.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=1175149664){kind=link}
Pour commencer 274 : Category:Ad Parnassum
- La version c:File:Ad Parnassum (originaler, gefasster Holzrahmen), Paul Klee (1932).jpg
- La source n’est pas exacte, c’est une photographie d’une reprod dans un livre. On voit d’ailleurs une légère vague sur la gauche (ma technique est tres artisanale). Entre le Probleme de titre (Polyphonie 2….) et de qualité des versions téleversées, le doublon d’éléments fusionnés sur wp aussi, j’ai bâclé ce detail lors de mon deuxieme téléversement (la source de mon premier téléversement : [ dead link ]). Desolé. Seulement noté en brouillon sans y revenir ici. Encore desolé.
Merci. Malik2Mars (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Malik2Mars: Bonjour, J'ai importé File:Ad Parnassum, Paul Klee (1932, 274).jpg depuis une source qui me semble fiable. Il n'y a pas de défaut, mais la résolution est plus petite.
- Plus généralement, je n'importe des fichiers que depuis des sources fiables (musées, ventes aux enchères ou Google Art & Culture) : sinon les infos sont manquantes, et plus grave, les couleurs, voire même les dimensions, sont fausses. Il y a beaucoup de sites qui vendent des reproductions, après avoir copié des tableaux depuis un musée ou depuis Commons, et modifié les couleurs, en général en plus « flashy » (tape-à-l'œil). J'ai supprimé pas mal de ces fichiers qui n'ont aucune valeur. File:Polyphony, 1932 Paul Klee, 2.jpg est un cas typique. Curieusement, ce tableau n'est pas mentionné sur le site du musée. Yann (talk) 13:49, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- J'ai importé File:Equals Infinity, 1932 - Paul Klee.jpg depuis le site du MoMA (meilleure résolution).
- C'est vraiment dommage de ne pas avoir un version en haute résolution de Ad Parnassum. Vu que le musée n'en fourni pas, il faudrait y aller avec un bon appareil photo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- Merci.
- Pour les fichiers ici et les données (ici, WD, WP), oui, bien sûr il faut des sources fiables, et les croiser (!). J’ai en effet relevé plusieurs problemes sur les projets et sur le web au niveau de la qualité des fichiers, ou pire des données… Le côté (très) « flashy », je l’ai même remarqué dans un ouvrage Klee (in fr), Éditions Citadelles et Mazenod, 2016, ISBN 978-2-85088-669-0, Wikidata Q111372367. Bref. J’ai donc (comme pour Kandinsky) créé des entrées "sources" sur wikidata afin de sourcer certaines données directement là bas. En plus des bases musées donc : Catalogues d’expo, biographies, et pour Kandinsky les catalogues raisonnés. J’ai longtemps tâtonné ne sachant pas comment faire ici et sur wd. Pour la qualité des fichiers, ne trouvant pour certaines œuvres rien de bien sur le web, j’ai parfois fait le choix de prendre une photo dans un livre. Voilà où j’en étais y’a qlq temps avant de faire une (très longue) pause sur ce sujet.
-
- 1932, 273
- Oui, cas « typique » comme tu dis. Couleurs, sens aussi que j’avais demandé de rectifier. En l’état, je trouve les deux fichiers dispo très sombre si je compare avec ce que j’ai dans plusieurs ouvrages. Je sais très bien que, dans un musée, ça peut varier en fonction de l’éclairage, etc. Et qu’entre deux ouvrages, il y a parfois de grosses différences (voir Kandinsky par ex : Category:Tempered Elan - Wassily Kandinsky. Ça me fait penser que je sais pas comment résoudre l’insistance du bot à ajouter un identifiant open library erroné sur Kandinsky : Catalogue raisonné de l'œuvre peint (in fr, en), 1984, ISBN 2-900971-00-4, Wikidata Q112194961… Y’a bien une edition dispo sur Internet archive, mais la version anglaise et c’est pas cet ouvrage sur Klee qu’il persiste à ajouter !.)
-
- 1932, 274. Les 3 versions :
- Lien source brisé pour cette version que j’ai téléversée C:File:Ad Parnassum, Paul Klee (1932).png ([ dead link ])
- Version avec cadre à améliorer, et rectifier la source C:File: Ad Parnassum (originaler, gefasster Holzrahmen), Paul Klee (1932).jpg. Ici, avoir une version avec le cadre d’origine me semble important. « Pour Paul Klee, qui avait une idée précise de la présentation de ses tableaux, l’encadrement faisait partie de son travail d’artiste » ( Paul Klee, vie et œuvre (in fr), Éditions Hazan, 2012, ISBN 978-2-7541-0645-0, Wikidata Q111369841, p. 315). Ça vaut aussi pour les supports cartons, etc. Certaines œuvres sont reproduites avec les « marges » coupées …. (Damisch souligne d’ailleurs le pb pour 1932, 275 (https://damisch.hypotheses.org/files/2017/06/Damisch-Egale-Infini-.pdf, p. 693))
- Ok, merci pour C:File:Ad Parnassum, Paul Klee (1932, 274).jpg
- 1932, 274. Les 3 versions :
-
- 1932, 275
- Merci. La legende/titre de Klee est bien : Gleich Unendlich, plus exactement meme « „ Gleich Unendlich ” » (en bas à droite; à gauche tu peux voir sa numérotation 1932 X15)
- Le MoMA ne donne pas le titre vo mais le titre "en" pour les œuvres de Klee. Autre exemple avec C:File:Vorführung des Wunders, Paul Klee, 1916.jpg (1916, 54). Tu remarqueras aussi que la version en ligne est plus « pâle ».
- Pour finir. Pour completer mon message sur w:fr:Discussion:Liste d'œuvres de Paul Klee#Fausses dates : ce numero donné à ses œuvres est parfois clairement visible sur le support (carton souvent), il convient de préciser aussi qu’à partir de 1925 c’est « crypté » (combinaison lettre+chiffre), afin de ne pas divulguer aux acheteurs le nombre d’œuvres réalisées par année…
-
- Voilà, afin de pourvoir travailler les fichiers ici, sourcer les elements wd correspondants, et les pages Wikipédia, j’ai cette page de brouillon sous forme de plusieurs tableaux w:fr: Utilisateur:Malik2Mars/Brouillon/Klee/Liste. Si besoin, ne pas hésiter à piocher ou me demander de verifier.
- Malik2Mars (talk) 12:56, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Malik2Mars: OK, merci. Je vais regarder cela en détail. Pour info, je mets les tableaux en attente d'une entrée dans Wikidata dans Category:Paintings by Paul Klee without WD item, principalement car je n'ai pas trouvé de source fiable. Si tu les trouves, merci de l'ajouter. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Merci à toi pour ce travail titanesque de vérif/correction ! Je vais regarder pour Category:Paintings by Paul Klee without WD item. Je remarque d’ailleurs qlq fichiers que j’ai moi-meme televersés rapidement. Notamment c:File:Das andere Geisterzimmer (neue Fassung), Paul Klee, 1925, 109.jpg (là, j’ai isolé mes notes dans le cadre de son influence sur les surréalistes w:fr:Utilisateur:Malik2Mars/Brouillon/Klee#Surr.). ou encore C:File:Pÿramide, Paul Klee (1930).jpg. Là, j’ai aussi mes notes mais je rencontre un Probleme depuis qlq jours avec http://www.emuseum.zpk.org/ (une mine d’or bibliographique pour les œuvres mais la qualité des fichiers est faible). @TLD35: a signalé le pb d’accès au ZPK y’a qlq jours. Nous allons planifier une visite à Berne sur juillet prochain d’ailleurs.
- Malik2Mars (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Malik2Mars: Je ne trouve pas mention de File:Eulen Komödie, 1926 - Paul Klee.jpg sur le site du Guggenheim. Une idée ? Yann (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Dans le cas ici, mon premier réflexe (disons méthode naïve), c’est de regarder les catalogues d’expo de ce musée en particulier. Trois (dont deux accessibles) sont listés sur mon brouillon w:fr:Utilisateur:Malik2Mars/Brouillon/Klee/Liste#Ressources (ces listes sont délocalisées via le modèle wp "extrait", le wikicode est sur mon brouillon central Klee). Désolé, je n’ai ajouté un ancrage que pour celui de 1967. Celui de 1993 est aussi listé : Paul Klee at the Guggenheim Museum, 1993. Celui-ci est accessible en ligne donc qlq clics et https://archive.org/details/paulkleeatguggen0000klee/page/132, p. 132, ill. p. 133 : « Owl Comedy (Eulen Komödie), 1926 / Watercolor and ink on paper, mounted on paper / Paper support 31.7 x 46.9 cm; paper mount 45.8 x 61 cm / Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum 39.512 ».
-
- Deuxième réflexe (moins naïf disons) : expo US. Idem, liste ressources sur brouillon : Klee and America, 2006, ->ancrage w:fr: utilisateur:Malik2Mars/Brouillon/Klee/Liste#HelfensteinHutton_Turner2006, et là idem, accès en ligne : cat. 44 p. 106 et 300 https://archive.org/details/kleeamerica0000klee/page/106: « EULENKOMOEDIE, 1926.48 / [Owl Comedy] / Partly sprayed watercolor and pen on paper, mounted on cardboard / 12½ x 18½ inches (31.7 x 46.9 cm) / Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, 39.512 ».
- A creuser/croiser. Malik2Mars (talk) 16:09, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Malik2Mars: Je ne trouve pas mention de File:Eulen Komödie, 1926 - Paul Klee.jpg sur le site du Guggenheim. Une idée ? Yann (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Malik2Mars: OK, merci. Je vais regarder cela en détail. Pour info, je mets les tableaux en attente d'une entrée dans Wikidata dans Category:Paintings by Paul Klee without WD item, principalement car je n'ai pas trouvé de source fiable. Si tu les trouves, merci de l'ajouter. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_Paul_Klee,_1925,_109.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Re bonjour. Encore moi, desolé. J’ai commencé à regarder en détail la Categ Category:Paintings by Paul Klee without WD item
Problème de date, c’est Ankunft des Luft-Dampfers, 1921, 17. Source initiale : [ dead link ] -> https://dia.org/collection/arrival-air-steamer/51053. Ça c’est rectifié. En regardant attentivement, je vois que tu as televersé des nouvelles versions pour d’autres œuvres au Category:Paintings by Paul Klee in the Detroit Institute of Arts. Comment as-tu fait s’il te plaît techniquement ? Faut-il le faire pour 1921, 17 ? J’ai essayé dezoomify.ophir.dev mais j’ai une erreur. En passant par les metadonnées du lien base musée j’ai deux url, un .jpeg, et .tif.
Voilà, qlq petites questions résiduelles avant de pouvoir être autonome.
Je vais tenter de creer l’entrée wd pour voir si je suis pas trop rouillé avec ça et faudra renommer le fichier ici.
Bon week-end ! Malik2Mars (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Malik2Mars: OK, j'ai renommé le fichier en File:Ankunft des Luftdampfers, 1921 - Paul Klee.jpg, et supprimé la redirection pour éviter que Google l'enregistre. C'est bien le premier fichier importé par Hochithecreator qui est presque correctement renseigné. Pour créer l'entrée WD, il suffit de cliquer sur l'icone "Create new Wikidata item based on this file". Yann (talk) 19:24, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Oui, j’ai déjà essayé cette fonction à l’époque, mais je n’adhère toujours pas à cette méthode de sourçage des déclarations sur wikidata : "importé de". C’est un non-sens à mes yeux.
- J’ai donc créé à la mano
- d:Q138589607 en me basant sur https://dia.org/collection/arrival-air-steamer/51053
- et d:Q138589662 en me basant sur Paul Klee : Entre-Mondes (in fr), , 2021, ISBN 978-2-08-023665-4, OCLC 1292602405, Wikidata Q111369857, p. 101 et 195
- Reste encore qlq déclarations à ajouter, clarifier. Notamment pour File:Betrachtung der Ruinen von Bt., Paul Klee (1924).jpg, collection privée mais en dépôt au ZPK, je ne suis pas arrivé à l’indiquer correctement sur wikidata, peux-tu clarifier cela s’il te plaît ?
- La qualité du fichier que j’ai televersé depuis http://www.emuseum.zpk.org/ est assez faible, donc je vais attendre un peu pour voir si le site Re fonctionne et si y’a possibilité d’en avoir une meilleure, ou alors je prends un photo dans le catalogue Entre mondes.
- Bref. Je vais m’occuper une à une des œuvres dans Category:Paintings by Paul Klee without WD item, c’est un tres bon exercice pour reprendre en douceur (chi va piano va sano).
- N'hésite pas à me dire si y’a un Probleme, ou si besoin de verifier/préciser pour d’autres œuvres.
- Malik2Mars (talk) 22:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- ps:Ah, oui, j’ai trouvé comment ajouter l’inscription/legende de Klee avec le numéro directement sur wikidata : déclaration
inscrition, assez simplement en fait ! - Malik2Mars (talk) 22:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Salut ! Sais-tu pourquoi l’utilisation ici de {{Cite Q|Q111369857}} ( Paul Klee : Entre-Mondes (in fr), , 2021, ISBN 978-2-08-023665-4, OCLC 1292602405, Wikidata Q111369857) et sur mon brouillon catégorise nos pages dans Category:Editions Flammarion ? Pour info, d’ailleurs, j’ai repris ici la liste auto des sources sur Klee que j’avais établie en pdd wp à l’époque. Tu la trouveras là si besoin User:Malik2Mars/Klee#Liste_src. Je vais essayer de continuer à creer les elements wd pour les ressources les plus notables/utiles pour étayer les données.
J’ai remarqué sur File:Eulen Komödie, 1926 - Paul Klee.jpg que tu avais utilisé directement "décrit à l’URL" pour indiquer les liens vers les ouvrages sur internet archive. Ok. Ça peut être une solution pour reduire la charge de travail dans certains cas. N’est-il pas possible de créer rapidement les elements éditions nécessaires à partir d’un identifiant ?.
Je suis en train de tester justement comment sourcer et du coup le visuel des Ref ici avec File:Betroffener Ort, Paul Klee (1922).jpg (j’ai listé les sources en brouillon pour le moment). En plus, pas simple : plusieurs titres, et le lien ZPK de départ est HS (j’ai trouvé que ça du ZPK en l’état : https://www.zpk.org/fr/api/files/2024-06/Dossier-de-presse_Kosmos-Klee_0.pdf).
.jpg){kind=link}
Pour finir, j’ai bien le gadget d’activé pour lancer des recherches d’autres images sur le web, mais pour le moment je ne peux pas ajouter en plus ce travail (Je note cependant ça à faire sur mon brouillon, pour plus tard). Donc n’hésite pas à televerser d’autres versions dispo.
Bon dimanche !
Malik2Mars (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Doublons
Re... Il y a un doublon d:Q135191127, d:Q138413479 pour le fichier ici File:Paul Klee - Dance of Moth, 1923.jpg (1923, 124 Nachtfaltertanz [Danse du papillon de nuit]), y'a une raison ? Du coup, je ne sais pas sur quel élément je peux contribuer.
- @Malik2Mars: J'ai fusionné les 2 entrées. Yann (talk) 22:59, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, merci. j'ai ajouté qlq données directement sur wd (titres, et ref).
- La version https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/wd/AgG_UW75jk-kiw est très "bleu", et on ne distingue meme pas un brin de de vert disons
- contrairement à https://jmapps.ne.jp/apmoa2/det.html?data_id=9985, Vie et oeuvre p. 160 et https://archive.org/details/paulkleenatureof0000kudi/page/70 (faut que je crée l'entrée wd pour celui-là aussi).
- Malik2Mars (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Malik2Mars: J'ai importé File:Dance of Moth, 1923 - Paul Klee.jpg. Habituellement les versions de GAC sont bonnes, quoique un peu sombres. Yann (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Final Reminder: CPUG Board Elections 2026 – Voting Closing Tomorrow
Dear Yann,
You are receiving this message because you are listed as a member of the Commons Photographers User Group and are included in the eligible voter list.
The Election Committee would like to remind you that voting in the Board Elections 2026 will close tomorrow.
If you have not voted yet, please cast your vote as soon as possible.
- Voting deadline: 7 March 2026 23:59 (UTC)
- Ballot: Go to the voting server
Full details about the candidates are available at: Candidates Overview
All eligible members are strongly encouraged to participate in the election.
For questions or discussion, please use the election talk page.
Unsubscribe / opt-out: If you do not wish to receive further notifications related to the CPUG Board Elections 2026, you may remove your name from the mailing list.
We look forward to your participation.
— CPUG Election Committee - 04:36, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
'원균 일대기 동영상' 삭제 유감
'원균 일대기'영상은 원균 기념관에서 홍보용으로 만든 공식 기록물 입니다. 누구나 배표와 이용이 가능한 동영상입니다.상업적이며 개인적 창작물이 아닙니다. 역사적 인물을 널리 알리고자 만든 교육용 작품입니다. 어떤 근거로 신속하게 삭제하였는지 알려 주시기 바랍니다. 릴렉스 (talk) 21:48, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- @릴렉스: "promotional purposes" doesn't mean it is free. Where is the evidence of a free license or public domain status? Yann (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Please help me to understand why a photo was deleted from Commons
Hello, I noticed that you deleted a photo from Commons called "Potter Wasp (Eumeninae)". This photo was taken by me, and I uploaded it directly to Wikimedia Commons from my computer hard drive. The work was created by me and anyone is free to use it. I published it under CC BY-SA 4.0. I have also put this photo on iNaturalist. The photo on Wikimedia Commons was not taken from iNaturalist, so I'm having trouble understanding how there is a copyright violation and why you deleted it. Can you please help me to understand? Thank you Hefree2 (talk) 07:37, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- I've just changed my photo license settings in iNaturalist to CC BY-SA. It might take a few hours for all of my existing photos to be updated with the new license choice. Hopefully this will help to resolve the issue and then maybe this photo can be "undeleted" from Commons. Thank you Hefree2 (talk) 08:22, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Hefree2: OK, I undeleted the picture. Yann (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Photo_Chayun
Good day! We have prepared the consent forms of the photographs on the pages https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Кудымова,_Евгения_Сергеевна and https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Чаюн,_Даниил_Викторович Could you please tell me where these consent forms should be sent? Thank you! D.v.chayun (talk) 08:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- @D.v.chayun: To permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. But please read COM:VRT before. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Discussion at User talk:FaviFake#Vandalism warning
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:FaviFake#Vandalism warning. FaviFake (talk) 16:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
File:Plaisance IMG 344643683.jpg Uploaded after warning
You placed {{Endofcopyvios}} on the uploader's talk page, after which they uploaded this coyvio 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 20:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- I have found many, many more uploaded since the warning. All are nominated for relevant forms of deletion 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 20:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Done Blocked, most files deleted. Yann (talk) 21:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- People like that annoy me. Thank you for blocking. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 22:36, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Photo deleted even though they are mine.
Hello,
I am the author of the photos uploaded on Wikimedia Commons. I confirm that these images were taken by me in Skikda.
I have already sent the permission email to the VRT team (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) confirming that I am the photographer and that I agree to publish the images under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license.
If needed, I can also provide the original files or additional photos taken at the same time.
Thank you for your time and for reviewing my files. Skikdialafleur (talk) 14:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Skikdialafleur: Hi, You have to wait for a volunteer from VRT to validate the permission. It may take some time. Please be patient. There is no need to ask admins, they are not all VRT volunteers. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)